Independent Medical Examiners: Quack Quack

By

Ben Glass

|

Owner and Long-Term Disability Attorney

Insurance companies usually utilize “independent” medical examiners to help prove their case by using one doctor’s stamp of approval agreeing that you are NOT disabled as proof that there is sufficient conflicting evidence for their denial to meet the minimum standards of being “reasonable.” In theory, the IME is there to give unbiased exams of claimants who do not have sufficient reporting from their doctor or to clarify any confusing or contested points in the medical record. In practice, however, IME doctors make a ton of money from insurance companies and know that as long as they routinely help the insurance company deny claims, they keep getting requested (and paid).

Independent medical examiners will review your disability claim and look for ways to deny it.We attack these IMEs in two ways: after researching the doctors, if applicable, we try to show that they are an inappropriate choice to evaluate our claimant’s case. For example, insurance companies will often pick their favorite IME because they can count on them for a denial, but if the IME specializes in cardiac issues they are an inappropriate choice to evaluate fibromyalgia. We also try to discredit the IME if we find that they do not have an active practice or perform so many IMEs that they have a financial expectation of the insurance companies.

Last year we had a case brought to us by our claimant’s wife because his Parkinson’s disease had already advanced so far that she managed all their affairs; his short-term memory was notably decreased every doctor visit and the numerous other effects of Parkinson’s disease were steadily increasing.

She showed us his denial letter from Standard Insurance Company still in disbelief. The denial seemed to rest on the evidence of one independent medical examiner—a “physician consultant,” as Standard put it—who claimed that the neuropsychological testing is done by our client’s doctor “confirmed mild cognitive impairment but no memory impairment. Your reported attention problems are not supported by the neuropsychological test data.” Our client’s wife showed us the doctor report and testing results that this “physician consultant” was supposedly drawing from. We could not figure out how it was possible to construe those records in any way but as proof of our client’s aggressively progressing Parkinson’s disease.

So we did some research on this “physician consultant.” We put his title in quotes because we found out that he is not a physician. In fact, to quote him from a past deposition, he says he is not “you, know, licensed to do medicine or anything like that. My training in medicine is more so working in rehab. […] I’m not an MD, you know, nor do I generally comment on medical issues, you know.” So what was he doing writing a paper review of our client with Parkinson’s? He was there because Standard knows they can rely on him for an easy denial, so they keep coming back to him—even when he is totally inappropriate to evaluate a claimant.

Here are a few more of his quotes from that deposition that we found particularly disturbing and illustrative of the fundamental flaws of “Independent” Medical Examiners 

  • “I rarely talk to people” (in reference to treating providers)
  • “I don’t talk about the case on the phone really. The insurance companies just send me the data and I write my couple of pages and send it back.”
  • “It could take me an hour, hour and a half at the most” (to perform an entire case review)
  • “My primary source of employment is probably working with the adolescents and the Standard Insurance and some private work.”

As for “private work,” he does not appear to have an active practice: his listed office location is a private home. Nothing on his resume indicates that he has experience with Parkinson’s Disease—or anything remotely similar.

And yet, this “physician consultant” who is neither trained nor licensed as a physician, whose main source of income appears to be medical exams for insurance companies, was used as the lynchpin argument by Stanard in denying our client’s claim.

While this is the MOST egregious example we could remember of an independent medical exam gone wrong, this type of issue—unqualified reviewers who are not in the thick of practicing medicine but instead rely on insurance company reviews for the majority of their revenue—is painfully common. These quacks do not get in trouble. They are not sued and do not have their licenses revoked for these kinds of false reviews. All they risk is a deposition and slap on the wrist should one of their cases end up in court. The rewards from insurance companies who know they can count on these reviewers for denial evidence, are huge sums of money. 

Client Testimonials

View more >

5 Stars

Google Review

I’m so glad to have found Ben Glass Law. My teenage daughter was a passenger in a car accident that left her with a fractured vertebra. When the bills rolled in and the stress mounted, …

– Amanda Amanda

Read More >

5 Stars

Google Review

I am so glad I hired BenGlasLaw for my injury. They are very responsive and did a great job!! I am very happy with them!

– Jenny Song

Read More >

5 Stars

Google Review

I had a car accident, and my lawyers, Allie and Melissa, were absolutely amazing throughout the entire process. They handled everything so quickly and efficiently, making sure my case w…

– Anosha Naseri

Read More >

5 Stars

Google Review

I was in a car accident and Lisa and Tammy did their best to help me . At the end of my case I was happy with how my case was resolved.

– Robinson Fernandez

Read More >

5 Stars

Google Review

I was in a no fault accident and was injured. Melissa & Autumn handled my case with professionalism and an easy to understand way. They kept me posted every step of the way. I would…

– Donna Fullmer

Read More >

5 Stars

Google Review

Hello my name is Kenny I was a tragic auto accident this accident will change me for life. I would like to share my experience with Ben glass law From the moment that I made a phone cal…

– Kenneth Fickes

Read More >

Case Results

View more >

$3 Million

Long-Term Disability Insurance Claims

High earning salesperson with “stiff person syndrome” awarded $10,000 a month in disability benefits

$1.825 Million

Long-Term Disability

Global HR Business Partner suffering from Rheumatoid Arthritis has long-term disability benefits restored after Hartford Insurance denies disability claim

$1.4 Million

Long-Term Disability

After being injured in a car accident, a software engineer is awarded disability benefits on appeal after getting denied by the insurance company.

$1.3 Million

Long-Term Disability Insurance Claims

Fairfax County Special Education Teacher Now Eligible to Collect Nearly $1.3 Million in Disability Benefits Following Successful Long Term Disability Appeal

$1.2 Million

Long-Term Disability Insurance Claims

Sometimes the coolest companies to work for don’t always have the coolest benefit plans.

$1 Million

Long-Term Disability

We fought for our client against an insurance company that ignored facts and terminated benefits on a very minuscule review.

$986,000

Long-Term Disability

A public school teacher was diagnosed with chronic lyme disease. Short term disability claim was denied when insurance company said she was misdiagnosed.

$947,394

Long-Term Disability Insurance Claims

CIGNA reinstates long-term disability benefits after Pro Se appeal denied. Second appeal is successful. Almost $1,000,000 in lifetime benefits

$761,380

Long-Term Disability

Long-Term Disability Client with Ankylosing Spondylitis Wins Against Prudential Disability Insurance

$750,000

Long-Term Disability

BenGlassLaw Long-Term Disability Team Wins Benefits for Physical Therapist Assistant ceased working due to a multitude of debilitating symptoms

View more >

BenGlassLaw fights for wrongfully denied workers across the nation. 

Since 1995, BenGlassLaw has been helping sick, injured, and disabled workers fight unfair claim denials, get the benefits they paid for, and get their lives back on track. We are passionate about restoring our client’s denied benefits because insurance policies should be part of the solution, not a cause of additional stress. What makes our team unique?

  • Our Experience. We file more long-term disability appeals and lawsuits than any other firm in the Mid-Atlantic. (Source: Pacer, the official government site for Federal Court lawsuits) 
  • Our Leadership.  Our work in ERISA Law is recognized and respected across the nation. We speak at national events and teach other national disability attorneys about our own techniques and processes for handling ERISA and life insurance denials.
  • Ongoing Support. Once we get our clients back on claim, it’s never them vs the insurance company again. For as long as our client receive benefits, we handle the insurance company — which is why we manage over $33 million in future disability benefits on behalf of our clients.
AV Martindale Peer Rated Award Badge
Justia 10.0 Lawyer Rating Award Badge